Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meetingof the IETF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ole,
I don't understand your last two sentences.  Are you suggesting that what's
left to do is to arrange the China meeting within the constraints of the
contract, as proposed?  Or are you suggesting that you need to go back and
attempt to re-negotiate that part of the contract?
Also, what precisely is there "more to come"?  I hope its not more
unpleasant surprises :-)
Regards,
Stephan



On 9/24/09 4:53 PM, "Ole Jacobsen" <ole@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> OK, fair enough. I should try for a narrower brush, it's been a long
> week :-)
> 
> The contract clause is indeed broad, I think as a deliberate step by
> the hotel to protect its economic interest in the event of a shutdown.
> So, what remains for us to do is to set forth the actual practical
> arrangements for the meeting. There is more to come.
> 
> Ole
> 
> Ole J. Jacobsen
> Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
> Cisco Systems
> Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
> E-mail: ole@xxxxxxxxx  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
> 
> 
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Melinda Shore wrote:
> 
>> On Sep 24, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
>>> We brag about being a global
>>> organization and how we're all connecting people together with our
>>> technology, but the minute we encounter a slightly ominous sounding
>>> clause we're going to just walk away?
>> 
>> I don't think that's a particularly fair characterization
>> of what's been said.  I think the issue is that there's a
>> lot that's really not known, that the wording of the
>> contract is unclear but a little threatening around stuff
>> that's known to happen at IETF meetings, and so on.
>> 
>> Looking at it from a threat evaluation framework, it seems
>> to me that the actual likelihood of something happening
>> along these lines is pretty small, but the impact of it,
>> if it did happen, would be enormous, and it's the enormity
>> of the consequences that makes this look more risky than
>> meetings in other places where the hotel contract doesn't
>> include clauses about shutting the meeting down if attendees
>> criticize the local government.
>> 
>> Melinda
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]