On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 9/23/09 10:05 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote: > > > There is absolutely NO intention or requirement to have any approval > > process for agendas or materials by a third party for this (proposed) > > meeting. > > What do we mean by "third party" here? I mean any government agency, the local host or even "ourselves". As others have said, there are no absolutes or guarantees, this is something we all know when we board airplanes for example, but an evaluation based on the available evidence would suggest that this issue isn't going to come up or cause problems. If someone really wants to prove me wrong, that is another matter, but I have always considered this community to be fairly friendly and cooperative even if we occasionally have strong disagreements. Ole Our assumption, and now I really AM repeating myself, is that our normal technical topics (including those that have "political implications") do not fall into a category that would require review and/or pre-approval. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf