I'm sure that's great advise from the lawyers, but you don't typically get to negotiate clauses that are required by national law. We'd obviously love to have it removed or reworded since this would remove any (some?) concern, but as Ray says, it's the law. Ole On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Adam Roach wrote: > > One of the points that I've had drummed into me by lawyers is that when the > language of a contract doesn't clearly match the intention of the parties to > the contract, then the language needs to be rewritten. So if the intention is > to prevent political protest, it needs to say exactly that and no more. > > I think Eric is being reasonable in interpreting the language to mean > literally what it says. > > /a > > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf