Speaking just for myself, I agree with Steve. I think it that is
better to engage than to retreat. Nothing is certain, but I also think
that it is highly likely that we would have a good meeting.
Regards
Marshall
On Sep 19, 2009, at 3:55 PM, Steve Crocker wrote:
The choice is between engaging and not engaging. Engaging is
better. Not engaging isn't constructive. The Internet and the IETF
are all about engaging, expanding, communicating and being open.
Much of this dialog has been worried about possible extreme
situations. Let's focus on the center. More than a billion people
live in China and their use of the Internet is expanding rapidly.
They are building much of the technology and contributing
technically. It's to everyone's advantage to have comfortable,
constructive interaction. Our first slogan was "Networks Bring
People Together."
If you prefer to focus on the negatives, here's my analysis:
If we don't go to China, we have charted a downhill course and the
rest of the world will come together without us. The IETF will lose
relevance.
If we do go to China and something bad happens, the consequences
will be much worse for China than for the IETF. The work of the
IETF will suffer a bit, but we'll recover quickly enough. However,
China's quest for engagement with the rest of the world will be hurt
more seriously.
Bottom line: We should go to China with a positive attitude. We're
robust enough to deal with any consequences. If we don't go to
China, however, we have weakened ourselves.
Steve
_______________________________________________
IAOC mailing list
IAOC@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iaoc
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf