Re: [Tools-discuss] meta-issues on charter discussions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As a side issue, it appears that Ekr is chairing TLS twice, at least
according to the linked TLS tools page.
--Richard

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:55 AM, <Pasi.Eronen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The tools WG pages used to have diffs between charter versions
> (see e.g. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/tls/charters/ -- the "delta"
> symbol leads to side-by-side diff between the versions), but
> it looks like this broke when new www.ietf.org was deployed
> in July....
>
> Best regards,
> Pasi
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>> ext Tony Hansen
>> Sent: 21 August, 2009 17:57
>> To: tools-discuss@xxxxxxxx
>> Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: meta-issues on charter discussions
>>
>> This was posted to the ietf list.
>>
>> While the charter history pages are nice, they can be made better using
>> a format similar to how tools.ietf.org presents RFCs and I-Ds: a
>> non-printing list of versions at the top with ways to show differences
>> between versions.
>>
>> Sounds like a job for the tools team. :-)
>>
>>       Tony Hansen
>>       tony@xxxxxxx
>>
>> Thomas Narten wrote:
>> > Re: old charters and such.
>> >
>> > While poking around earlier this week, I found:
>> >
>> >       http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/history/
>> >
>> > (it is hanging of the WG pages, so not that hard to find.)
>> >
>> > It appears to be a snapshot of charters whenever they change. But,
>> > they "change" often due to events that are probably not the kind of
>> > changes we are thinking about, and there is no indication about what
>> > has changed, so there are a lot of copies and wading through them to
>> > find stuff appears pretty daunting. And the history only goes back 3
>> > years or so...
>> >
>> > But they might be a basis for some tools to extract stuff. But, if
>> > tools are going to do this, it seems like an archival format other
>> > than HTML would be desirable.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf mailing list
>> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> _______________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]