Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada dot com> wrote:
If we really want to make progress here it's not going to happen by > reaching rough consensus after a long discussion, but by a (very) > small group of people getting together and coming up with something > that improves upon the current situation for (pretty much) everyone, > rather than optimize for one particular way to interpret the state of > the universe.
But as John pointed out, this isn't going to happen unless that group can focus on what "the current situation" refers to, and try to solve one problem at a time, and stop pretending that ASCII vs. Unicode and fixed vs. floating line breaks and ASCII art vs. bitmapped/vector graphics and "which tool is best" are all the same issue. --Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14http://www.ewellic.orghttp://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.htmlhttp://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ _______________________________________________Ietf mailing listIetf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf