RE: More liberal draft formatting standards required

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Have a look at Dave Mills recent remarks on the NTP list :
https://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/2009-June/001519.html

Due to his diminished eyesight he can't handle the text
of the document he is co-authoring without significant preprocessing.

Y(J)S


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Melinda Shore
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 02:23
To: Randy Presuhn
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List
Subject: Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required

Randy Presuhn wrote:
> I don't know.  I prefer vi.

You can run nroff on a buffer inside of both vi and emacs
and get the output in another buffer.

I've read internet drafts on a variety of handheld devices,
from the old Sharp Wizards to Palm Pilots to a Blackberry,
and I very much appreciate having a lowest-common-denominator
document format.  The only drawback has been the fixed line
length - it can be slightly annoying for text but it renders
ascii graphics completely useless on a narrower screen.  On
balance I think it's a reasonable tradeoff, though.  And
personally, I'm grateful that such a wide variety of tools
can be used to generate conforming drafts - I think that it
helps keep the process just a little more open.

Melinda
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]