On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 03:20:20PM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote: > To me, 1.34pre3 appears to be exactly as stable as 1.33 (modulo the > instability inevitably introduced by the 5378 train wreck). I have actually run into a somewhat cryptic error message (which I was unable to reproduce on earlier releases, but which I was also unable to reproduce consistently anyway), and I've seen some other reports of issues with 1.34pre3, so it appears there are some dust bunnies in the corners. If I knew anything at all about TCL, I'd probably try to do more work on it, but as it is I'm just grateful that those who work on xml2rfc do as good work as they do. (That isn't to say that there isn't an issue here with process, but as I already that is not a criticism of the xml2fc developers.) A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxx Shinkuro, Inc. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf