Actually, that raises a very good point. At present the list is neither secret, nor public. Any bad effect from the list being public will occur, any bad effect from it being secret can occur. On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Bob Hinden<bob.hinden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Joe, > >> 1) exposing the full list to the entire community invites lobbying the >> nomcom >> >> This probably already happens to some extent, but do >> we really want to encourage this? > > It's not clear this will lead to more lobbying than we have now. I think > lobbying happens a lot now and is driven by the candidate him/herself, or > the many people who get the "secret" lists. I think it would be more > balanced if everyone knew. > > I would add that the current system gives a greater ability to comment on > candidates to the leadership (IAB/IESG/WG Chairs) because they get the many > of the "secret" nomcom candidate lists. The nomcom might get broader > feedback if the lists are open. > > Bob > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > -- -- New Website: http://hallambaker.com/ View Quantum of Stupid podcasts, Tuesday and Thursday each week, http://quantumofstupid.com/ _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf