Re: Publicizing IETF nominee lists [Fwd: Last Call: draft-dawkins-nomcom-openlist (Nominating Committee Process: Open Disclosure of Willing Nominees) to BCP]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 03:32 11-06-2009, Melinda Shore wrote:
worth a shot.  Enough people feel the current
process isn't working to suggest that the current
process really isn't working.

It suggests that there is a perception that the current process isn't working.

At 04:51 11-06-2009, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
One thing that struck me as a real risk is that similar concerns that
may affect the IETF might have been ignored because of the people and
the manner in which they were raised rather than on the merits. That
does not make them any less of a liability.

I don't know whether there is risk or not. It's not the manner or the people that raised the concerns that matters (to me).

The current structures pretty much ensure that these issues only get
raised by fringe elements.

I won't qualify people who raise such issues as fringe elements. I believe that they are an important, and somewhat overlooked, part of the process.

Regards,
-sm

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]