Re: Fw: Last Call: draft-dawkins-nomcom-openlist (Nominating Committee Process: Open Disclosure of Willing Nominees) to BCP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I support the use of "should".

Spencer Dawkins wrote:
Brian Carpenter had a Last Call comment that I needed to follow up on...


Hi,

(IETF list not copied as I'm on leave and minimising email, but
there is nothing confidential about this comment.)

      Feedback on nominees should always be provided privately to
      NomCom.  Nominees should not solicit support, and other IETF
      community members should not post statements of support/
      non-support for nominees in any public forum.

I believe these three occurrences of 'should' need to be 'must'.
I don't think there should be any wiggle room on this point.

   Brian

Russ thinks I should check on this with the rest of the community, so I'm asking for feedback now.

Thanks,

Spencer

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]