Re: Fw: Last Call: draft-dawkins-nomcom-openlist (Nominating Committee Process: Open Disclosure of Willing Nominees) to BCP

[Harald Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I support the use of "should".

Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> Brian Carpenter had a Last Call comment that I needed to follow up on...
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > (IETF list not copied as I'm on leave and minimising email, but
> > there is nothing confidential about this comment.)
> >
> > >       Feedback on nominees should always be provided privately to
> > >       NomCom.  Nominees should not solicit support, and other IETF
> > >       community members should not post statements of support/
> > >       non-support for nominees in any public forum.
> >
> > I believe these three occurrences of 'should' need to be 'must'.
> > I don't think there should be any wiggle room on this point.
> >
> >    Brian
>
> Russ thinks I should check on this with the rest of the community, so 
> I'm asking for feedback now.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Spencer
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf