Re: WG Review: Multiple InterFaces (mif)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 25 April 2009 22:32:35 ext Christian Huitema wrote:
> > A host may have multiple default gateways on the same "interface".
> > However, those gateways should be usable interchangeably. All of those
> > gateways should have the same "values" for the properties above.
> > Otherwise, I would argue the network is broken and/or the host is
> > misconfigured. In other words, it can pick any of its live gateways
> > outbound, and may receive packets from any of those gateways in the other
> > direction. If I'm not mistaken, the IETF IPv6 wireless network is an
> > example of this.
>
> There are obvious examples where multiple gateways make sense. For example,
> a home network could have routers attached to different broadband
> providers, with different bandwidth and different connectivity
> characteristics. Rémi, you may believe that this is a configuration error,
> but it is only an error because our protocols do not handle that
> configuration very well.

It is a configuration error. If only because existing devices on the network 
assume that those gateways work the way I said, interchangeably.

> I would expect MIF to address the problem and
> suggest fixes...

I doubt MIF can solve backward compatibility.

-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont
Nokia Devices R&D, Maemo Software, Helsinki

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]