Re: Security Assessment of TCP

[Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

On 2009-4-14, at 20:51, Fernando Gont wrote:
> Lars Eggert wrote:
> > > My personal take is that the IETF is responsible for the  
> > > maintenance of
> > > its protocols, and this effort carried ut by the UK CPNI should be
> > > welcome, and the IETF should take the chance and benefit from this  
> > > work
> > > to publish advice on TCP security/resiliency.
> >
> > I agree with you, as I've already said on the TCPM list. (See my  
> > email
> > there for details.)
>
> What are your thoughts about working on this I-D in the transport  
> area?
> (with hat on).

I believe this should be done in the transport area, because at least  
some of the techniques under consideration could be argued to not be  
fully conformant to the published TCP specs, and I want the TCP  
experts to evaluate their impact.

Lars

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf