Re: Comment on draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Melinda Shore wrote:
> Scott Brim wrote:
>> I was asking how the site knows when its hosts peers have been upgraded,
>> so that it can allow their traffic to be routed out multiple interfaces.
> 
> Yeah, exactly, although the canonical Unix-y way to
> do this would be to try it and see what you get back.
> If it doesn't work, catch the error and fall back to
> whatever it is you've planned to fall back to.
> There are obvious problems with this in a network
> environment (latency, resource consumption) but it's
> already how the IETF has chosen to deal with NAT
> traversal (ICE) so I expect there's a reasonable
> question about whether or not connectivity tests can
> (or should) be extended to transport, etc..

Yeah because resource reservation and and capability negotiation are
definitely thing we want to have to do on an IP network before
initiating a connection.

> Melinda
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]