As you might know, generally, legal mind tend to focus on "past" not on
"future".
So, law or legal mind can't be used for calculation of states of future.
Law can be described as formulas, I think.
For managing the future, theorem or formulas should be used,
just as academic arts such as social science or artificial intelligence,
sh'dn't it?
// NANCHATTE-HAKASE/Local Pseudo Doctors will easily chages
// their minds according to the future of RFC or atmosphere of IETF.
In good faith,
Abraham TaddyHatty
taddyhatty at acm dot org
Apparently, publishing a message as "experimental" is an invitation by the
IETF to experiment with a new protocol. What sense does that bear, if
accepting IETF invitations is likely to result in legal troubles?
grenville armitage wrote:
Lawrence Rosen wrote:
[..]
Or are some at IETF actually trying to set implementers up for legal
action by refusing to evaluate *disclosed* threats?
Helping hapless implementers evaluate patent threats sounds like a job
for the Internet Legal Task Force.
I believe they're two doors down, on the right...
http://www.isoc.org/isoc/general/trustees/mtg07.shtml
26 - 27 June 1995, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
[...]
6.18 Legal and Regulatory Initiatives
The Executive Director briefed the Board on the developments relating to
the proposed Internet Legal Task Force (ILTF), a proposed body whose
objective was described as the investigation of various legal issues
regarding the Internet and its social impact. The sense of the Board was
to invite those interested in such an agenda to participate within the
IETF framework and ISOC conference structure, but the Board did not wish
to endorse the formation of an ILTF as a part of the ISOC organizational
structure.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf