John C Klensin wrote:
They certainly have gone through an IETF process to get
published, whether they're a working group document or
individual contribution.
April 1st RFCs are one example of non-IETF RFCs.
So is the entire independent submission track
Rather than having us randomly provide stray explanations about RFC basics, why
don't we simply suggest that people who are interested in discussing the nature
of, and concerns with, RFCs first become familiar with the considerable set of
documentation that define and describe them, starting with:
<http://rfc-editor.org/RFCoverview.html#streams>
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf