On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Melinda Shore wrote: > On 3/11/09 3:24 PM, "Ofer Inbar" <cos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I was also under the impression that a lot of RFCs are *not* "IETF > > RFCs", since the RFC editor will publish certain types of RFCs without > > them having gone through an IETF process. > > They certainly have gone through an IETF process to get published, > whether they're a working group document or individual contribution. April 1st RFCs are one example of non-IETF RFCs. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot@xxxxxxxx> http://dotat.at/ GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf