Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug at acm dot org> wrote:
What this draft ask for is to be mandatory to list in a specific > section the names, authors and sponsors of early implementations > available in source form. Everything that does not fall under the > definition can still be acknowledged as it is now (or not) in the > normal Acknowledgement section. And if there is no early source > implementation, then the section is empty.
Why not simply make the section optional, then, and let authors and WGs include it if they think it will provide better insight into the specification -- or improve its chances of being approved -- and let others ignore it if they choose? --Doug Ewell * Thornton, Colorado, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14http://www.ewellic.orghttp://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.htmlhttp://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages ˆ _______________________________________________Ietf mailing listIetf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf