At Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:26:09 -0500, Tim Polk wrote: > > Folks, > > After some time reflecting on the hundreds of messages submitted to > the IETF discussion list, I have come to several conclusions about > progressing draft-housley-tls-authz. I will summarize the conclusions > up front, then provide the rationale for those decisions in the > remainder of this message. > > 1. Last Call demonstrates that the community does not support > progression of this document on the standards track, but sufficient > support exists for publication as an Experimental RFC. > > 2. The community would like the TLS working group to develop a > standards track mechanism for TLS authorization, I'm not trying to be difficult, but I don't think this is actually clear, as it's not the question the LC asked. -Ekr _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf