Randy Presuhn wrote:
"Informational" makes sense to me at this time.
Why?What are the specific aspects of this specification that fail to qualify for Proposed Standard?
What changes to the specification will fix these deficiencies? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf