On Sun, 9 Nov 2008, Keith Moore wrote: > > It is worth repeating that just because the notion of a reputation > service has value, and such services are widely used, does not imply > that using IP addresses as identifiers or the DNS protocol as a means of > transmitting reputation are technically sound. There is reason to doubt > both of these assumptions, and there is no evidence that these design > questions have been given due consideration and resolved - as our > process would normally require. Could you give us a reference to an explanation of why the DNS might not be a sound choice of protocol for reputation services? This protocol can use domain names as lookup keys as well as IP addresses. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot@xxxxxxxx> http://dotat.at/ ROCKALL MALIN HEBRIDES BAILEY: NORTHERLY OR NORTHWESTERLY 6 TO GALE 8 DECREASING 4 OR 5, BACKING SOUTHWESTERLY 5 OR 6 IN ROCKALL AND BAILEY LATER. ROUGH OR VERY ROUGH. RAIN OR SQUALLY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf