Hi Russ,
At 14:10 09-11-2008, Russ Housley wrote:
Not all Informational and Experimental documents are
standards-related. Some are. Not all Informational and
Experimental documents are published as part of the IETF
stream. Some are. I'm not sure what text change would help add clarity.
I understand that. You provided some text in a later message which
sounds better.
This is very similar to the point raised by John Klensin. Since
"harmful" is the term used in RFC 3292, I have asked Harald to
provide some insights before making any changes to this wording. I
understand your point, but I want to make sure that I'm not missing
some historical context.
Jari's message provided me an insight of why the word is used and
about documents on which the IESG reaches conclusion 5.
The RFC Editor, in agreement with the IAB, shall manage mechanisms
for appropriate technical review of independent submissions.
Likewise, the IRSG, in agreement with the IAB, shall manage
mechanisms for appropriate technical review of IRTF submissions.
That sounds better.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf