This rule should not exist for IPv4 or IPv6. Longest match does not make a good sorting critera for destination address selection. In fact it has the opposite effect by concentrating traffic on particular address rather than spreading load. I received a request today asking us to break up DNS RRsets as a workaround to the rule. Can we please get a errata entry for RFC 3484 stating that this rule needs to be ignored. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf