Hi Frank, At 21:04 01-06-2008, Frank Ellermann wrote: >Hopefully we'll get a 5555 next year :-) I hope so too. :-) >Dunno, independent drafts are non-IETF by definition, using one >adjective "individual" everywhere at least doesn't add to any >existing confusion about "individual" vs. "independent" drafts. >Example: The topics discussed in this document are relevant to all I-Ds unless one views independent drafts as documents set in read-only mode only. >But the guidelines are for IETF drafts, that's either WG draft >or individual, but not independent. Ignoring IAB drafts and Good point. Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf