Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis: closing the implicit MX issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Tony Hansen wrote:
>  From this viewpoint, running code wins.
> 
> I'm also swayed by the principle of "least surprise". 
...
> Last of all, I'm swayed by the discussions around RFC 974 and the DRUMS
> archive search 
...
> So the bottom line is that I see sufficient support for including AAAA
> lookups when implicit MX comes into play.

Wow.

Diligently thorough.  Carefully reasoned.  Historically solid.  (Running code 
that interoperated was what resolved a problem with checksum for the original 
TCP spec...)

Nice job, Tony!

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]