Dave Crocker wrote: > Tony Hansen wrote: >> From this viewpoint, running code wins. >> >> I'm also swayed by the principle of "least surprise". > ... >> Last of all, I'm swayed by the discussions around RFC 974 and the DRUMS >> archive search > ... >> So the bottom line is that I see sufficient support for including AAAA >> lookups when implicit MX comes into play. > > Wow. > > Diligently thorough. Carefully reasoned. Historically solid. (Running > code that interoperated was what resolved a problem with checksum for > the original TCP spec...) and it completely ignored the entire purpose for updating 2821 - to keep it relevant. I call foul. Keith _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf