RE: Nomcom process realities of "confidentiality"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The random selection process coupled with the relatively small number 
of volunteers is an interesting factor in all of this. I have been
selected 3 times (albeit the second time it all fell apart in The 
Giant Reset of 2006 :-) and volunteered probably 10 or 15 times.

It's either hard to get on the nomcom or easy, depending on your point
of view.

Ole


Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@xxxxxxxxx  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj



On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Eric Gray wrote:

> Dave,
> 
> 	As a clarification, the NomCom is a small crucible of 
> specially-empowered volunteers.  The fact that one has to be
> a volunteer explicitly makes it the case that self-selection
> is a factor in at least the initial phase.
> 
> 	Hence it is very much the case that people who feel 
> excessively unqualified may elect not to volunteer.  
> 
> 	Also, it is the case that the processes within NomCom
> are very open to sharing experience within the self-selected
> group of people who probably felt capable of making personnel
> selection decisions before volunteering.
> 
> --
> Eric Gray
> Principal Engineer
> Ericsson  
> 
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]