FOlks, At a minimum, the IPv6 effort last week providing essential experience for many of the participants. But What did it provide for the IETF IPv6 community? The wiki at <http://wiki.tools.isoc.org/IETF71_IPv4_Outage/IETF71_IPv4_Outage_Experiences> records source data. It's goodness, but it is not integrative and it is not directive. Unless I've missed some other url, producing a summary assessment of last week currently rests with reporters. I suggest that a serious experiment needs participants to produce experimental questions and to specify questions for future actions. For example: For the deployment and success of IPv6, what is the current state of utility? What are the deficiencies that need to be remedied? What issues should be explored at future interoperability events? What other questions should be asked? A good experiment has specific goals and produces specific information. What was learned from last week? By way of offering an exemplar and to provide a bit of counterpoint to the view that last week was boring and worked fine, I'll note that I could not contact any web sites from my Windows XP laptop. I tried a number of times over the course of the experiment. So my own experience was indeed boring, but not in the way any of us would wish. When a user can turn on their production version of v6, in a network claiming to support it, and it just works, then we can say things really are boring. We all know we are a long way from there. What specific things are needed to get from here to there? Let's treat this as a real community project with real deliverables. And maybe even milestones? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf