Re: a thanks to the Gen-ART reviewers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



And my thanks, specifically to Pasi, Miguel(twice), Vijay and Joel, who 
as GenART reviewers, provided thorough reviews of documents I recently 
shepherded or co-authored, and followed up diligently after revised 
documents have been published and sent a "ready for publication" or 
"addresses all comments" emails.  Thanks guys.

(I picked the recent instances).

best,
Lakshminath

On 3/8/2008 7:03 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
> Andrew Newton wrote:
>> To Eric, Spencer, and all the other Gen-ART reviewers:  Thank you.
>>
>> My experience with Gen-ART reviews has been very positive, and I  
>> appreciate your work and effort.  I realize you weren't seeking public  
>> praise, but your volunteer contribution to the good of the IETF should  
>> be recognized.
>>   
> 
> I have to say that I really like these and the cross area reviews a lot. As
> an author/editor having to digest zillions of posts on the lists mixed with
> time and entropy, it gets really hard to look at the draft with the 
> critical eye
> of somebody who might have to actually try to make sense of it. Not to
> mention trying to determine what the draft says versus the lore that's
> built up around it.
> 
> If I could make a suggestion, what might really be useful as well is 
> collecting
> implementation notes, and especially what throws people off when coding
> up the draft, or implements things in new and unintended ways. Unintended
> can sometimes be very cool, but often it's that the draft isn't 
> sufficiently
> precise.
> 
>           Mike, who tries to do this but given a cookie cutter form 
> might do better
> 
>> On Mar 7, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Eric Gray wrote:
>>   
>>> Minimally, as one of the people to whom that has happened, it would be
>>> nice if at least an initial ("thanks for the review and comments")  
>>> mail
>>> included the commenter, in every case.  Even a "I wish you would stop
>>> bothering us with all of these silly comments" would be a response.
>>> Of course, I presonally would prefer that that sort of response was  
>>> not
>>> addressed to the list, with or without me on it.  :-)
>>>     
>> _______________________________________________
>> IETF mailing list
>> IETF@xxxxxxxx
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>>   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IETF mailing list
> IETF@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]