Re: I-D Action:draft-rosenberg-internet-waist-hourglass-00.txt]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> So as was already mentioned, one could
>> argue the waist hourglass is HTTP and HTTP/SSL, and this discussion is
>> irrelevant.
>>     
>
> Many NATs and firewalls block incoming TCP sessions or unexpected UDP  
> packets. So if we use the logic "only stuff that works on 100% of all  
> hosts connected to the internet is relevant" then EVERYTHING is  
> irrelevant.
>   

You are missing a really important point: Things just don't work if you 
do not have a protocol for establishing and maintaining the e2e 
connectivity.
SIP (in combination with ICE), for example, is such a protocol that 
allows you todo that. Mobile IP is another one (when you fix various 
things) etc.

It is implicit in Jonathan's draft but maybe it should be made more 
explicit.

Ciao
Hannes

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]