Being the RFC author, I'm naturally very much interested..... still, I'll observe that the procedure that seemed most important to me, which was getting new versions out whenever they were needed, has been exercised exactly once: in http://www.ietf.org/IESG/content/ions/dated/, the only document in 2 versions is Brian's "procdocs" document. So the 3rd option in the evaluation process: 3. We cannot decide yet; the experiment should continue might be an option to seriously consider. (This of course has some disadvantages - for instance, we have discovered that we can't write text into a BCP that says "the information about X is to be published as an ION" before IONs are permanent. But perfection seems to escape us every time....) Harald _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf