Re: [IAOC] Re: Let's look at it from an IETF newbie's perspective... Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Dec 19, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Matt Mathis wrote:

Why not do this for the entire meeting ? In fact, why not do it for the entire meeting even if there isn't a plenary outage ?


Good idea!, except perhaps 71 is too soon.  How about the plenary
outage as planed for 71, and the entire IETF after that?


I actually had in mind a parallel network, offering only IPv6, but with v4 still available on the original network, at least in the beginning.

(Perhaps support IPv4 in the terminal room only, for individuals who don't have enough leverage to move their home institutions.)

I suspect that there are enough good engineers at the plenary to route around any artificial restrictions. For example, those with Macs and EVD0 cards could easily set up wired or wireless LANs offering v4...



The point is not to cause people to debug during the IETF, but to cause people to notice deployment problems and to have them fixed by the following
IETF.


So would it be OK if I set up a high bandwidth multicast HD video stream from the plenary ? The IETF used to be
a great tool to help debug multicast problems...

Thanks,
--MM--


Regards
Marshall



_______________________________________________
IAOC mailing list
IAOC@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iaoc


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]