Necessity may be the mother of invention. But in order to invent we must know to distinguish what is necessary from cool capabilities offered to us by the technology.
Twitter is really, really cool. It also has the utility of a square tomato: A solution to a problem few people know about and even fewer care about. From: Ping Pan [mailto:pingpan@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tue 01/01/2008 11:00 PM To: 'Franck Martin' Cc: dcrocker@xxxxxxxx; 'IETF discussion list' Subject: RE: Deployment Cases Personally, I don’t believe in any “authority” telling me what’s needed, what would be the future and what to do next. Necessity is the mother of all invention. The market today needs to have the standard protocols in a number of areas. IETF seems to be the right place to get job done. ;-)
Best regards,
- Ping
From: Franck Martin [mailto:franck@xxxxxxxxx]
Isn't it the role of the IRTF/IAB/? to look at which areas should the IETF put more effort into?
Dave, MPLS is an IP technology that has been largely driven inside IETF. Millions of users have benefited from the backbones running with MPLS protocols. It's about 10-year old. MPLS has refined, modified and reused many other IETF protocols, RSVP, OSPF, ISIS and BGP etc. Also for the role of IETF, I think it should take a more active role in creating standard protocols for the industry. One example comes to mind is in the area of streaming video - way too many proprietary protocols today. Another place that needs some serious help is P2P. The lack of standard in those areas has negative impact to their growth. Regards, - Ping _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
-- Franck Martin ICT Specialist franck@xxxxxxxxx SOPAC, Fiji GPG Key fingerprint = 44A4 8AE4 392A 3B92 FDF9 D9C6 BE79 9E60 81D9 1320 "Toute connaissance est une reponse a une question" G.Bachelard |
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf