Hi Spencer
thanks for the quick reply
i see your point and it is indeed the receiver. i have already
submitted a newer version. I will address these changes in the next
version
Regards, marcelo
El 23/12/2007, a las 1:24, Spencer Dawkins escribió:
Hi, Marcelo,
I think we're good on everything except one semi-nit - and I'm good
on the DAD text I questioned, because I didn't have the context
about not performing DAD as a DoS mitigation (just to be explicit
about that).
In the remaining text below, I think I was actually asking "who
verifies" - if it's the receiver, I might suggest s/we may need to
verify/the receiver may need to verify/, etc.
Thanks, and thanks for a quick reply (while I could remember
writing the review!)
Spencer
----- Original Message ----- From: "marcelo bagnulo braun"
<marcelo@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Kurt Lindqvist" <kurtis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Geoff Huston"
<gih@xxxxxxxxx>; "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx>;
<ietf@xxxxxxxx>; "General Area Review Team" <gen-art@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-shim6-hba-04
Hi Spencer,
thanks for the review
see comments below...
El 24/11/2007, a las 3:59, Spencer Dawkins escribió:
For multihoming applications, it is also relevant to verify if a
given HBA address belongs to a certain HBA set. An HBA set is
identified by a CGA Parameter Data structure that contains a Multi-
Prefix Extension. So, it is then needed to verify if an HBA
belongs
Spencer: "needed to verify" appears twice in two sentences, and I
don't understand what it means. I'm guessing this is saying
something like "needed to verify", but I'm really in the weeds
here (I'm not sure who is doing the verification, either - I can
guess, but I can't figure that out from the text)
ok, i have changes it is needed to verify bu we need to verify,
resulting in the following text:
For multihoming applications, it is also relevant to
verify if a given HBA address belongs to a certain HBA set. An HBA
set is
identified by a CGA Parameter Data structure that contains a Multi-
Prefix
Extension. So, we need to verify if a given HBA belongs to the HBA set
defined by a CGA Parameter Data Structure. It should be noted that we
may
need to verify if an HBA belongs to the HBA set defined by the CGA
Parameter
Data Structure of another HBA of the set
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf