On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:21:04PM -0800, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > Rhetorical question. > > Does your vpn client policy file use dotted quads or a hostname? > > If you had access to a nat64 translator would your vpn client assuming > it supports ipv6 cope? Given that most VPN's generally work if the client is NAT'ed (which is often the case when accessing the network from an airport or hotel wireless network), would they not necessarily work if there was a NAT64 or NAT+PT box made available on the IETF network? And wouldn't that solve the problem for engineers who need to access IPv4-only servers (of whatever kind; CVS, SVN, IMAP, http, etc.) that are behind a VPN? If not, why not? And are people trying to figure out a solution to that problem? After all, that's a critical piece of any IPv4/IPv6 transition program.... - Ted _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf