>>>>> "Tony" == Tony Hain <alh-ietf@xxxxxxxx> writes:
Tony> the right experiment. It is not right because it does
Tony> nothing positive, other than the threat -maybe- spurring
Tony> some action. A more realistic experiment would be to run the
Tony> entire week with a double-nat for IPv4 (and nats between the
Tony> access points to simulate consumer-to-consumer
Tony> configurations), where the most public one has absolutely no
Tony> provision for punching holes (because realistically an ISP
Tony> is not going to punch inbound holes for its customers, or
Tony> allow them to).
I strongly support this experiment and believe it would be a really
good idea to run. I do think behave-compatible nats should be used,
but besides that, I think the experiment you propose is far more
valuable than the v6-only experiment.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf