At 22:58 -0800 12/14/07, Christian Huitema wrote:
>Maybe reports of "the DNS is broken when you do go to pure IPv6" are
>more valuable than "you can only go to IPv6 if you jump through these
>hoops that only advanced Internet users can do".
Is the IETF afraid to eat it's own food?
Or is it willing to do what's necessary (in the interim) to adjust to
the new cuisine?
Our networking team at Microsoft did run an "IPv6 only" trial during
the development of Windows Vista. Volunteers only. The volunteers would
disable the IPv4 stacks on their PC, and then attempt to go on with their
normal work, both for internal applications such as corporate mail, file
servers, or intranet servers, and for external applications, mostly web
based. It worked, but it had to rely on a set of transport proxies for those
internal applications that were not yet IPv6 ready, and of course web proxies
for internal access.
(keeping with my food-based theme)
Learning from others' taste testing is good. But it's better to
taste it "your=IETF"self. ;)
As someone else said - I bet these were willing volunteers.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar
Think glocally. Act confused.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf