> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 05:11:47PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > > Mark Andrews wrote: > > > >> Hello Ray , > > > >> > > > Brian > > > > You need both physical (power, hardware, location) and > > operational (different global prefixes, preferably different > > AS's) diversity for reliable DNS. > > > > It's clear from the infomation above that the later is not > > being met. > > > > Mark > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > it -could- be that these are two XEN images on the ssmae > box. HOWEVER. the point remains taht Ray explicitly > told us that this was a transitional attribute that > would be corrected before the transition was complete. > > so take a breath, go out and cut the grass (or burn it off) > and try not to micro-manage the transition... this is > one of those cases where operational expedience and a > desire to let folks know what is happening seems to have caused > an over reaction. I hope they correctly manage the transition. By that I mean that all nameservers (both old and new) serve the *same* zone content during the transition. Otherwise there will be servers that will stay locked on the old nameservers until they cease to serve the zone. Mark > as usual, YMMV > > -- > --bill > > Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and > certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise). > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf