--On Tuesday, December 11, 2007 9:43 AM +1300 Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It is only a patch. If you do it, it is not clear to me what
the STD number (still) accomplishes.
It's a new way into the maze and I think it's worth doing
quickly, since
it doesn't misrepresent the formal standards process in any
way. Ideally,
www.rfc-editor.org/smtp and www.rfc-editor.org/STD10 would also
take you straight there too. (Tools prototype?)
Of course, if "STD10" is a separate document, we are on the path
to ISDs. If it isn't, RFC 2026 and the application of STD
numbers only to Full Standards takes a hit.
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf