If you think that way, then why don't you say so on the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List where such a comment needs to be heard. Discussion about ARIN policy on this list will not influence the policy process. Ray > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 12:58 PM > To: Bob Braden > Cc: john-ietf@xxxxxxx; narten@xxxxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: IPv6 RIR policy [was Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce > after all] > > Bob Braden wrote: > > In this whole discussion, I find it hard to keep separate the > > technical issues, about which the IETF should care a lot, from > > the business model and issues, about which the IETF should be > > agnostic. We may personally care a great deal about the business > > issues, but we cannot speak as an organization about them. > > > well, mumble. we shouldn't be biased toward any particular business > model. but there's nothing wrong with being biased towards > flexibility, > or being biased against the RIRs changing IETF decisions to favor a > particular business model. > > again, the fundamental problem here is that the RIRs are trying to > second-guess IETF design decisions. > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf