> At 11:27 -0700 8/27/07, Ted Hardie wrote: > > >After reading the document, I do not believe it has > >sufficient detail to be advice to IANA. > > I agree with that. I've sent details on this privately to the > editor, WG chair, and IESG secretary as that is mostly a matter of > mechanics. > > >I think even that is an inaccurate reflection of this document. > >"Should the IETF instruct the IANA to set up this registry?" would > >be a closer reading, at least in my opinion. My answer to that > >question is no. > > After getting my head up out of the registry operations quicksand I > am becoming increasingly convinced that setting up a DLV at IANA is > the wrong step to take. > > > The second is that these instructions essentially > >force the use of at least two DLVs. > > That's very convincing to me. Having a second DLV operator doesn't > benefit the public Internet enough to ask IANA to take on the extra > role. > > And yes, if there is to be DNSSEC anywhere the public Internet root > zone ought to be signed. The alternative is to direct IANA to collect, maintain and distribute this information to the DLV operators in the absence of a signed root. This would give a trusted path for data entry into the general DLV trees. > -- > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 > NeuStar > > Think glocally. Act confused. > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf