Sorry. No it does not make any changes. Our practices remain the same.
Russ
At 02:34 PM 8/27/2007, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
Hi, Russ,
Spencer:
This document is intended to set expectations. It does not make
any normative changes to RFC 2026.
Russ
Got that part.
I'm actually asking whether the ION makes any changes in the
expectations set in the 02 version of the now-dead IESG draft, which
the IESG has been referencing in conversations about DISCUSS ballot
positions for a while now - doesn't look like it, but wanted to make
sure what you guys think.
Thanks,
Spencer
At 01:08 PM 8/27/2007, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
Hi, Russ,
A quick comparison with version 02 of this draft (from 2006,
currently listed in DEAD state) is showing minor typo corrections
and a million format changes, but the criteria haven't changed in
any meaningful way. Is this your understanding also?
Thanks,
Spencer
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf