Re: ION Announcement: DISCUSS Criteria in IESG Review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Russ,


Spencer:

This document is intended to set expectations. It does not make any normative changes to RFC 2026.

Russ

Got that part.

I'm actually asking whether the ION makes any changes in the expectations set in the 02 version of the now-dead IESG draft, which the IESG has been referencing in conversations about DISCUSS ballot positions for a while now - doesn't look like it, but wanted to make sure what you guys think.

Thanks,

Spencer

At 01:08 PM 8/27/2007, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
Hi, Russ,

A quick comparison with version 02 of this draft (from 2006, currently listed in DEAD state) is showing minor typo corrections and a million format changes, but the criteria haven't changed in any meaningful way. Is this your understanding also?

Thanks,

Spencer



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]