Hi, Russ,
Spencer:
This document is intended to set expectations. It does not make any
normative changes to RFC 2026.
Russ
Got that part.
I'm actually asking whether the ION makes any changes in the expectations
set in the 02 version of the now-dead IESG draft, which the IESG has been
referencing in conversations about DISCUSS ballot positions for a while
now - doesn't look like it, but wanted to make sure what you guys think.
Thanks,
Spencer
At 01:08 PM 8/27/2007, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
Hi, Russ,
A quick comparison with version 02 of this draft (from 2006, currently
listed in DEAD state) is showing minor typo corrections and a million
format changes, but the criteria haven't changed in any meaningful way. Is
this your understanding also?
Thanks,
Spencer
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf