Keith Moore wrote: [..] > I believe I understand how to replace DNS with a better protocol while > preserving the existing hierarchy and RRsets and DNSSEC, and allowing > graceful transition from the old to the new. However, I'm not sure that > I have enough understanding of DNS's failings to engineer something that > addresses all or most of them - I just know about the ones I've run > into. But I'd like to hear from other people who are interested in > replacing DNS, maybe we could collaborate on a proposal that shows how > DNS could be improved and how replacement of DNS is feasible. Might I suggest that you first start doing what most sensible people have been doing over the long long years of human existence: - define your problem - define what you want to solve - define for what you want to solve it And then after that is all done, realize that the problem you have is very difficult. The IETF has a simple process for all of this: write a draft. And the alternative process is: build running code. But afaik you already know about this. Bickering about all this is fun of course, but it doesn't help coming to a solution, especially as the solution doesn't have a defined problem set and what it is supposed to solve. Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf