>>>>> "Henning" == Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Henning> Rather than an IESG note or in addition to, I think the
Henning> author should clearly state, in the abstract, that this
Henning> is a personal opinion only.
I don't think my personal opinion would make a very useful document,
but if that's all we can come away from this process with then that's
all we will achieve.
First, I'd rather try and build consensus and get more review.
Failing that, I think we could come up with a way of describing the
status of this document that does not give the impression that it has
even less review than other documents that are of the same status.
I.E. I think it would be an unfortunate outcome if we feel the need to
add a bunch of warnings in this case simply because we've had a
discussion and realized that we don't entirely agree on what our
documents mean.
I think making it clear that this is not normative is quite important.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf