>> no. the important point is that all users need to initially have enough >> address space that they can attach not just multiple networks, but >> multiple layers of networks, at that point. trying to define the >> difference between the two types of end-users is silly. the reason that >> IPv6 has so many bits in its address space is to allow for expansion at >> the edges without making addresses variable length. >> > > You missed the point in my mail completly. My only point was that we probably > need to split the /48 boundry into two, one for big or those who ask > for it, they > will all get a /48. And the standard that everyone get if they dont ask for a > /48. I disagree. There's no technical justification for splitting the /48 boundary, and far too many advantages to standardizing on a single prefix size for end users. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf