Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Roger Jørgensen wrote:
>
> I am fully aware of that it will very likely be more than one subnet at some
> point, that is why the last paragraph was included. Anyway, the important
> point is that we probably should have two different type of end-users, big
> and small.
no.  the important point is that all users need to initially have enough
address space that they can attach not just multiple networks, but
multiple layers of networks, at that point.  trying to define the
difference between the two types of end-users is silly.  the reason that
IPv6 has so many bits in its address space is to allow for expansion at
the edges without making addresses variable length.

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]