> It seems that someone in ARIN land believes that IPv6 addresses are > scarce resources that need to be carefully dribbled out to customers > according to need. The following proposal has just been formally made to > change ARIN's allocation policy. for the world peace, as long as it does not have impact to global routing table (= do not leak out on cross-AS border) it is fine. for the ease of use for customers, it is a no-no, because they would like to use /48 always. if they get /62 or something they will need to get more prefixes again and again, and/or the amount of addresses would affect the address allocation policy towards the customer network subnets. so, i would like to say "do not do this". is it too late or still possible? itojun _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf