Re: consensus and anonymity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2007-06-01 18:52, Michael Thomas wrote:
...
part. Still, I think it's a myth that these hums are *just* the sense of the room and no more. They're clearly a lot more than that as it almost always brings
a conclusion to some point of contention, and when it's brought up again on
the list you can almost always be guaranteed a "but we decided this in Oslo!".

That's exactly when a good WG chair or AD *should* say: Yes, but now we have
a new technical issue that we need to analyze.

Of course, there's always scope for argument whether a an issue is really
new and really significant.

    Brian



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]