Re: consensus and anonymity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
The current process doesn't work very well when voting is required, after hum-style consensus has been inconclusive.
Why should voting be required? If the goal is consensus, "inconclusive"
shows that you haven't achieved it. Right? That seems to me that the
process is *working* as intended.

      Mike

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]